Traknova vs Kasava

Traknova. This is the clearest gap between the two. Traknova ships a covert ghost immobiliser that needs a PIN sequence before the car will start, plus a relay immobiliser, remote lock and unlock, and hardware trackers. A cloned key or a relay attack gets a thief nowhere, and if a vehicle does go missing you can track and lock it.

Kasava. There is no immobilisation in the platform. Kasava records and reconstructs the incident and speeds the claim afterwards, which is valuable, but it does not stop the car being driven off.

Kasava. The KDC507 dual and KDC603 triple cameras cover road, cabin and rear with 4G and AI alerts for collisions and lane departure. The real edge is the evidence engineering: per-frame cryptographic signatures, a tamper-evident chain from capture to insurer, and court-ready evidence packs. It is built to win disputes.

Traknova. The 4G online dashcam gives you cloud footage, collision alerts and AI insights, which handles everyday evidence well. It is not engineered as a forensic, insurer-facing chain of custody, so on pure claims evidence Kasava is ahead.

Kasava. This is the whole point of the platform. Automated first notification of loss sends a full packet to your insurer in minutes, fraud signatures are flagged on-device at the moment of impact, and zero-knowledge telemetry lets insurers verify risk without seeing every trip. If your battle is loss ratio, nothing here matches it.

Traknova. It helps with claims indirectly. Fewer thefts and clear footage mean fewer and cleaner claims. But it does not plug into insurer claims systems the way Kasava does.

Traknova. Live GPS tracking, geofences, alerts, driver scoring and AI insights, all behind one login with the security layer built in.

Kasava. Strong live tracking with driver coaching and scoring on top, oriented around risk. For core day-to-day operations both platforms cover the ground, so this one is an honest draw.

Traknova. Pricing is bespoke to your fleet size and use case, with the security hardware included and everything on one bill. You get a quote matched to how you actually operate rather than a rigid per-seat fee, and there is no separate hardware line to reconcile.

Kasava. Kasava publishes pricing tiers and quotes hardware separately, and the return is measured in claim savings that take time to show. For an operator who wants one bill that covers the camera, the tracking and the security together, Traknova is the tidier package.

Kasava. Operating since 2019, deployed across more than 11,000 vehicles, with six UK patent applications behind the architecture. This is a proven platform with named customers, not a deck-stage idea.

Traknova. Newer and in early growth, but already award-winning, named Fleet Management Company of the Year at the Prestige Awards 2025/26. Less scale than Kasava, but built squarely around the operator use case.

Kasava. Excellent if you are running an insurance-led programme or a large, claims-heavy book. For a smaller operator whose main worry is theft and simple day-to-day running, it is more platform than the job needs.